![]() A new and highly virulent strain of the rabies virus emerges and spreads through the human population with frightening speed. The ISW said the milblogger's statements "suggest that the Russian military command may be increasingly concerned over a potential Ukrainian landing". Moscow could also be fearing both outcomes, military analysts say.Īccording to the ISW, Russian sources have previously said that Moscow's troops have been repeatedly ordered to "eliminate" a grouping of Ukrainian soldiers near the Antonivsky Bridge despite "significant personnel and equipment losses".Ī Kremlin-affiliated milblogger also reportedly raised concern that Ukrainian forces will continue to conduct small attacks across the Dnipro river ahead of a large-scale attack "to break through to southwestern Kherson". The ISW said "exaggerated Russian praise" for the reported defeat suggests the military command "sincerely fears a Ukrainian attack" on the east bank or "that it is desperate for an informational victory" after the Wagner Group's aborted mutiny last weekend. In its latest assessment of the war, the Institute for the Study of War said a Russian official claimed its military had repelled Ukrainian forces from their positions near the Antonivsky Bridge on the east bank of the Dnipro river. Russian officials celebrated the alleged defeat of "small-scale" Ukrainian landings in the country's southern Kherson region yesterday "as if they had won a major victory", a US-based military thinktank said. Further access will still be needed," he said. "Until now they have not observed any mines or other explosives. IAEA director-general Rafael Mariano Grossi said such reports are taken "very seriously", adding that he had asked experts to "look into this matter and request the access they need for doing their job". The agency said it was aware of reports that explosives had been placed around the power plant. No indications of mines or other explosives have so far been found at Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant - but full access is needed for further checks, the UN's nuclear watchdog has said.Ĭoncern over a possible disaster at the plant has been ongoing since Russia seized the site last year - and Volodymyr Zelenskyy yesterday warned that the situation there remains a "serious threat".Įxperts from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspected parts of the plant's cooling system on Friday, and have been conducting regular walkdowns across the six reactor units and other areas around the site. "This has the potential to end Russian occupation of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and return it to Ukraine management in the most effective and safe manner." "Instead, Ukraine might seek to encircle the plant, clear the surrounding area, and then negotiate the safe passage of those Russian forces remaining at the facilities. He says: "However, this risks damage to the plant itself, and provides Russia with the opportunity to blame Ukraine for any damage to the facilities, even if instigated by Russia. "However, there is a raft of supporting infrastructure - such as cooling and electrical power - that might be targeted by the Russians to cover any withdrawal," he says.Īn option for Ukraine in its ongoing counteroffensive is to launch an "all-out assault" on Russian forces based at the plant to recapture it, Bell adds. ![]() Military analyst Sean Bell says that although the prospect of fighting at the boundaries of a nuclear plant is a "major concern", the main nuclear reactors are well protected and "unlikely to be damaged by conventional military action". Concern about a potential nuclear disaster at the Moscow-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in southern Ukraine continues.Įxperts have repeatedly said the plant, seized by Russia last March, is at risk from shelling near and around it.īut is there anything Ukraine can do to minimise the risk of a nuclear incident at the facility?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |